I personally don't think that Alexander is a great person. I have not met him in person, but him making me and all the troops battle again when were told we could leave isn't good. It makes me think he is a liar and that he is selfish. He also makes the troops that were in the defeated army fight with us. They have no choice. And then we use them in the mix of our army. I think that this makes us a little weaker because we just defeated them. We have no idea if they had been defeated by the armies that surrounded them. It is a bad move for Alexander to make.
Alexander doesn't make the Macedonian way of life the standard in his captured land. This blends the culture and makes the overall Macedonian culture distorted and fuzzy to outside empires. It makes the people that are newly taken into Macedonia happier, that's a good thing. I think that it is better for Macedonia's citizens to be on Alexander's side than against him. This helps Alexander to have the citizens like him. But for the military it is different. We have to try and communicate with them if they don't speak our language. This can be frustrating and can start arguments and fights. This does hurt us when we are on the battlefield.
Alexander the Great can be compared with Abraham Lincoln. Abraham Lincoln was educated, but not like Alexander was, Lincoln was mostly self taught and had no formal education. Lincoln helped all the people that were enslaved, he signed and executive order that freed the slaves. Then once the Confederacy surrendered, all the slaves now worked for their previous owners, but now they were paid. This made a lot of people like him, and a lot of people dislike him.
Works Cited
World History: Patterns of Interaction. N.p.: n.p., 2012. Print.
"Alexander the Great." colorado.edu. N.p., n.d. Web. 26 Sept. 2013.
<http://autocww2.colorado.edu/~toldy3/E64ContentFiles/AncientHistory/
AlexanderTheGreat.html>.
Cohane, Krista, Stefanie Gustafson, and Zinovia Lazarids. "Alexander the Great."
fairfield.edu. N.p., n.d. Web. 26 Sept. 2013.
<http://faculty.fairfield.edu/rosivach/cl115/people/alexander.htm>.
Furdock, Corey. "The Empire of Alexander the Great." psu.edu. N.p., n.d. Web. 26
Sept. 2013. <http://www.personal.psu.edu/asg198/Final%20Project/
alexempire.html>.
niu.edu. Abraham Lincoln Historical Digitization Project, 2000. Web. 26 Sept.
2013. <http://lincoln.lib.niu.edu/abio.html>.
Untereker, Jed, James Kossuth, and Bill Kelsey. "Alexander the Great."
williams.edu. N.p., 1996. Web. 26 Sept. 2013.
<http://wso.williams.edu/~junterek/>.
Worthington, Ian. "How 'Great' Was Alexander?" utexan.edu. N.p., 1999. Web. 26
Sept. 2013. <http://www.utexas.edu/courses/citylife/readings/
great1.html>.
Yale Law School. Yale Law School, 2008. Web. 26 Sept. 2013.
<http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/emancipa.asp>.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI liked the negative view on Alexander, it really was different from the figure the articles that try to make him seem great.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI like your negative view point of Alexander. I never thought of it that way. I wish you explained more on why would the mixed army make your army weaker?
ReplyDeleteBubba, I personally found reading this blog post interesting and engaging. I was thrilled to see that you think Alexander was not a great person and that you think he should not be called the great. While reading this post I recognized that you emphasized the details which made reading this blog post more enjoyable.
ReplyDeleteBubba, I personally found reading this blog post interesting and engaging. I was thrilled to see that you think Alexander was not a great person and that you think he should not be called the great. While reading this post I recognized that you emphasized the details which made reading this blog post more enjoyable.
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed that you disagreed with the idea of Alexander being considered great. It is an unpopular point that many would not think of arguing, and I respect that you did that. I liked how you talked about the defeated enemies being added into the Macedonian army, and you made a good point of how it had the potential to weaken the army. I did not know that before I read your blog post, and I think that it is extremely interesting.
ReplyDelete